Strong Kirchheimer vs Gavin Van Peperzeel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Kirchheimer vs G. Van Peperzeel
Strong Kirchheimer
USA
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
30
Age
33
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$8.2K
Career Money
$720
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Gavin Van Peperzeel
AUS
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
30
Age
33
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$8.2K
Career Money
$720
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 0 - 0 Peperzeel
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kirchheimer | 0 |
| Peperzeel | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
S. Kirchheimer vs G. V. Peperzeel H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Kirchheimer vs G. V. Peperzeel Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Strong Kirchheimer has won 47.94% of points on their second serve, while Gavin Van Peperzeel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Strong Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 43.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gavin Van Peperzeel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.40% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Strong Kirchheimer has saved 60.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gavin Van Peperzeel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Strong Kirchheimer has won 37.93% of matches played (W/L 22/36), with Gavin Van Peperzeel winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Strong Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 74/61), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 174/153). Gavin Van Peperzeel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 114/68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Strong Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.48% of matches (W/L 11/20), where as Gavin Van Peperzeel has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Strong Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 405.29 while Gavin Van Peperzeel has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Strong Kirchheimer has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gavin Van Peperzeel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Strong Kirchheimer has converted 32.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gavin Van Peperzeel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Strong Kirchheimer vs Gavin Van Peperzeel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kirchheimer 50%, Peperzeel 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kirchheimer 47%, Peperzeel 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Kirchheimer 60%, Peperzeel 0%.
S. Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Drummondville Challenger - 10-11-2025 | ||||
Q3  Jangjun KimJ. Kim | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1  Benjamin Thomas GeorgeB. Thomas | W | 6-1 1-6 7-6(5) | ||
| Knoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025 | ||||
Q1  Peter MakkP. Makk | L | 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
| Charlottesville Challenger - 27-10-2025 | ||||
Q1  Dhakshineswar SureshD. Suresh | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Sioux Falls Challenger - 20-10-2025 | ||||
Q1 Dan MartinD. Martin | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | ||
G. V. Peperzeel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Australia F3 (Mornington) - 19-03-2018 | ||||
R1 Michael LookM. Look | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | ||
 Australia F2 (Mildura) - 05-03-2018 | ||||
R2 Dayne KellyD. Kelly | L | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 Edward BourchierE. Bourchier | W | 6-2 7-6(10) | ||
| Australia F1 (Renmark) - 26-02-2018 | ||||
R1 Lucas VuradinL. Vuradin | L | 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
 Launceston Challenger - 05-02-2018 | ||||
Q1  Renta TokudaR. Tokuda | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
S. Kirchheimer vs G. V. Peperzeel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.69% (313/270) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.38% (230/164) |
| 54.05% (728/619) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.61% (511/376) |
| 52.13% (6643/6100) | Games Win/Loss | 52.09% (4357/4008) |
| 53.21% (174/153) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.87% (107/88) |
| 54.81% (74/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.64% (114/68) |
| 53.72% (65/56) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2025 | Aces Total | 723 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1071 | Total Double Faults | 424 |
| 1:28:13 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 465.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 607.62 |
| 64% (21226/33011) | 1st Serve % | 64% (6582/10359) |
| 69% (14625/21226) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (4531/6582) |
| 52% (6100/11785) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1903/3777) |
| 39% (1253/3187) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (382/1028) |
| 39% (12948/33623) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4042/10503) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 43.54% (91/118) | Challenger W/L | 51.47% (35/33) |
| 59.89% (218/146) | Futures W/L | 60.82% (194/125) |
| 54% (309/574) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (226/386) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (82/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (74/113) |
| 44% (80/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (52/107) |
| 82% (329/271) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (240/204) |
| 17% (329/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (240/36) |
| 17% (254/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (154/25) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:30 AM 21/11/25
PredictionK. Nishikori1K. Uchida8W1
1.32
W2
3.04
10:30 AM 21/11/25
Prediction
G. Shebekinq
L. Rossi2W1
3.4
W2
1.26
12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction
L. Preda
I. Xilas5W1
2.35
W2
1.51
08:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction
H. Habib3
J. P. VarillasW1
1.98
W2
1.72
05:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction
G. Heide
N. Kicker7W1
1.333
W2
2.96
03:30 PM 21/11/25
PredictionG. PirainoG. CadenassoqW1
2.4
W2
1.49
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
Yuriko Miyazaki
Tamara Korpatsch14:00
H2H 1-0
James DuckworthDane Sweeny04:35
H2H 0-0
Yasutaka UchiyamaRei Sakamoto05:10
H2H 0-0
Jason Murray KublerAlex Bolt06:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal